Gay Parade Spotlights Differences Between the Christian and Muslim World

by paulie on November 10, 2012 at 5:08 pm
Posted In: Los Angeles, Media

Anti-Christian gay parade shows differences

between Christians and Moslems

 

A somewhat insulting anti-Christian, anti-Jesus parade in Hollywood by a small group of gays  in recent years spotlights the difference between the Christian and the Muslim worlds. The parade, in which a grown man in diapers is being pushed down Hollywood Boulevard to see his “mommy” at his home at Virgin Records (note the store is now closed down) while a mob of dressed up gays are singing “Silent Night, Holy Night”, hardly raised an eyebrow. The media never mentioned it; the Christians just shook their heads, wondering what new insults they will have to endure during their joyous holiday season.

Compare this to the recent anti-Mohammad video that caused such an explosive reaction in the Middle East. Riots in Cairo at our Embassy, westerners threatened with death, and an ugly mood all around. In Libya, a pre-planned attack against our Embassy in which four Americans, including the Ambassador, were killed, took place in a very hostile atmosphere. Although the video was not the cause of the attack, the Libyans were becoming more anti-Western by the day.  A lot of this because of a video made by an unknown guy and hardly seen by anyone until blared out in the Muslim press.

Meanwhile, in Hollywood, California, a small but insulting, mocking parade goes almost unnoticed. I would challenge those gays to go to the streets of Cairo and put on an anti-Muslim parade, like dragging a mannequin of Mohammad behind a camel. How many of them would come back to Hollywood in pine boxes? Gays want to be treated equally in all matters, maybe they should give some respect to others, including, dare we use the word, “Christians”.

But the larger issue is that America spends billions of dollars in foreign aid, much going to Muslim countries. When do we pressure these countries to change their ways, respect freedom of speech and freedom of religion?  Probably never. Maybe a good Christmas present to the Christian community would be to fire everyone in the State Department.  Why should we support rotten governments around the world who are reviling us, our beliefs, and our religious tolerance? And, by the way, our sexual tolerance.  Being openly gay in the Muslim world is dangerous.  Some countries in Africa are threatening to murder homosexuals and may be doing so at this moment.  How much foreign aid and support is given to these countries and why do we continue to do it?  Killing Christians in Egypt (which is happening) or gays in Africa, should motivate the State Department to issue some strong words:  like stop this crap or you will never get another dime from us and we will embargo and sanction your evil country.

A final point: if you are in a personal bad situation and are hungry, you can go to one of the many Christian churches in the area for a free dinner.  They will not ask you if you are gay or straight, Christian, Jew or Muslim.  They will just feed you.  And they will do it with a tremendous joy in their hearts.

 

You can watch the video here: http://youtu.be/sz0AtmAQ1-8

Posted by Ed Murray

└ Tags: , , , , , , ,
 Comment 

DID PROP 37 REALLY LOSE OR WAS IT VOTE FRAUD?

by paulie on November 9, 2012 at 2:40 am
Posted In: GMO Articles

By Jon Rappoport
November 8, 2012
www.nomorefakenews.com

Read Full Article
 
Hold your horses.
 
On election night, not long after the polls closed in California, the announcement came out: Prop 37 was losing. A little while later, it was all over. 37 had gone down to defeat.
 
But is that the whole story? No.
 
As of 2:30PM today, Thursday, November 8th, two days after the election, many votes in California remain uncounted.
 
I tried to find out how many.
 
It turns out that the Secretary of State of CA, responsible for elections in the state, doesn’t know.
 
I was told all counties in California have been asked, not ordered, to report in with those figures. It’s voluntary.
 
So I picked out a few of the biggest counties and called their voter registrar offices. Here are the boggling results:
 
Santa Clara County: 180,000 votes remain uncounted.
 
Orange County: 241,336 votes remain uncounted.
 
San Diego County: 475,000 votes remain uncounted.
 
LA County: 782,658 votes remain uncounted.
 
In just those four counties, 1.6 million votes remain uncounted.
 
The California Secretary of State’s website indicates that Prop 37 is behind by 559,776 votes.
 
So in the four counties I looked into, there are roughly three times as many uncounted votes as the margin of Prop 37?s defeat.
 
And as I say, I checked the numbers in only four counties. There are 54 other counties in the state. Who knows how many votes they still need to process?
 
So why is anyone saying Prop 37 lost?
 
People will say, “Well, it’s all about projections. There are experts. They know what they’re doing. They made a prediction…”
 
Really? Who are those experts? I have yet to find them.
 
For big elections, the television networks rely on a private consortium called the National Election Pool (NEP). NEP does projections and predictions. Did NEP make the premature call on Prop 37? So far I see no evidence one way or the other.
 
NEP makes some calls for the television networks, but NEP is composed of CBS, CNN, FOX, NBC, ABC, and AP. It could hardly be called an independent source of information for those networks.
 
NEP has AP (Associated Press) do the actual vote tabulating, and NEP also contracts work out to Edison Media Research and Mitofsky International to do exit polls and projections based on those polls.
 
Edison Media Research did the exit polls in the state of Washington for this election. How? They surveyed 1493 people by phone. Based on that, I assume they made all the projections for elections in that state, even though there is no in-person voting in Washington, and voters can submit their ballots by mail, postmarked no later than election Tuesday. So how could Edison know anything worth knowing or projecting on election night?
 
Both Edison Research and Mitofsky were involved in the 2004 election scandal (Kerry-Bush), in which their exit polls confounded network news anchors, because the poll results were so far off from the incoming vote-counts.

 Comment 

Proposition 37 Did Not Pass!

by paulie on November 8, 2012 at 7:26 am
Posted In: Corporations, Health, Politicians

Here is a classic case of the public being convinced that ignorance is bliss.  The campaign to compel the producers of genetically modified food to identify their products so that the public will be able to make informed choices in their selection of what they (we) eat has failed to pass.   One can only conclude that the Monsanto campaign has convinced the voting public that it is best not to be informed.

Monsanto is attempting to take over and monopolize the food supply!  This organization is engaged in activities that are flagrantly monopolistic and prosecutable under RICO statutes.  To spell it out, that means Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organization.  Monsanto supplied the funding for the campaign against labeling its products.  In the last 2 weeks before election a massive disinformation effort was launched to successfully keep us all in the dark about what we are eating.

Ignorance prevails; that’s what the public wants.

Captain Bill

 

 Comment 

Now You Know The Power of Corporations!

by paulie on November 8, 2012 at 3:59 am
Posted In: Corporations, GMO Articles, Health, Police State

(This post is from www.yardeats.com)

 

Now you know the power! The power of big corporations. Proposition 37 in California went down to defeat. The corporations spent somewhere around 45 million dollars to convince voters that they do not need to know what is in their food. It is unbelievable. We here at Yard Eats find it hard to fathom why people would not want to know that GMOs are in their food.

The defeat of Prop 37 makes it even more urgent that you should start your own backyard garden NOW! With no way to tell which products are genetically modified, consumers are now at the total mercy of corporate chemical warfare on their food. Be on the alert. Your life and health may be at stake!

 

P.S. A list of the corporations who financed the “No” on 37 is on the site WWW.You-Rant. Keep this in mind when you shop.

 

 Comment 

Food companies Monsanto, Dupont, Pepsico and Nestle spend $45 million to defeat California GM label bill Prop 37

by paulie on November 5, 2012 at 4:04 pm
Posted In: GMO Articles

READ FULL ARTICLE HERE – Food companies Monsanto, Dupont, Pepsico and Nestle spend $45 million to defeat California GM label bill Prop 37

The contentious measure would require labels on GM food sold in supermarkets, but would not cover restaurants

Monsanto and other agribusiness and food companies have spent more than $45m (£28m) to defeat a California ballot measure that would require labelling of some GM foods.

The measure, proposition 37, is one of the most contentious initiatives on California’s election ballot on Tuesday.

If it passes, it would require labels on GM food sold in supermarkets, but would not cover restaurants. It also has a number of gaping loopholes. For example, the law would not require labels on meat from animals that were fed GM corn.

Even with those caveats, the agribusiness and food companies have outspent the yes side by about five to one trying to kill the bill. Monsanto alone has spent more than $8m.

“I think it’s a David and Goliath story with the companies that manufacture or benefit from genetically engineered food being the Goliath,” said David Newman, president of Maplight, which tracks the influence of money in politics.

“When you see this lopsided spending it indicates that the measure is popular with voters and opponents think they need to spend a lot to defeat it. There is a lot at stake here not just in California but how it will trend in the rest of the country.”

California’s ballot initiatives often take on huge importance. Often they are seen as laboratories for new ideas, that are adopted later in the rest of the country.

The bill is mainly supported by organic food companies, although the actor Gwyneth Paltrow also contributed $15,000, according to campaigners.

 Comment